Lumethic
Check If a Photo Is AI-Generated
Upload an image and we read its Content Credentials, the signed record that tools like ChatGPT, DALL·E, Adobe Firefly and licensed Midjourney workflows attach to generated images. The check is free, runs in your browser, and your file is not uploaded anywhere.
Drag & drop a photo here, or click to select
JPEG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, HEIC, TIFF, SVG, DNG and ARW are supported
Choose a photoYour photo is analyzed entirely in your browser, it is never uploaded.
C2PA test photos
Inspect a prepared test image in one click, or download it to test your own validator, plugin or workflow.
No credentials found? Run the free quick provenance check
Most images carry no Content Credentials, and that alone proves nothing. Lumethic's server-side quick check goes deeper than the browser can: it screens the photo's metadata, compression history and manipulation traces and returns a report you can share. JPEG, PNG, WebP, HEIC, AVIF and GIF are supported. Free, no account needed.
Have the camera's RAW file? A full verification compares it against the photo and gives you far stronger evidence.
What this checker can and cannot tell you
What it can tell you
- Whether the image carries C2PA Content Credentials, and if so, which tool created or edited it, including recorded AI generation.
- Whether the credentials are intact or the file was modified after signing.
- Which camera or software produced the credential, when, and what edits were recorded.
What no tool can tell you
If an image has no credentials, no tool can prove whether it is real or AI-generated. Pixel-based AI detectors guess from statistical patterns. They regularly flag real photos as AI and let AI images pass as real.
This is not a limitation of this particular checker, it is the current state of the art. Detection accuracy drops with every new model generation, while a cryptographic record stays verifiable.
Read why AI detectors produce false positivesDo you need to show that your own photo is real?
Photographers who are asked for evidence, for example by a contest, a client or an editor, do not need a detector. Verify your camera's RAW file against the exported JPEG and you get a verification report you can share.
How the check works
Drop in an image
JPEG, PNG, WebP or AVIF. The file is analyzed locally in your browser with the open-source C2PA SDK. It never leaves your device.
We read the credentials
The checker parses the C2PA manifest: who created the image, with what tool, whether AI generation was recorded, and whether the signature still matches the pixels.
You see the result
You see what the image's provenance record says, and a clear note when there is no record to read. There is no probability score.
Common signs an image is AI-generated, and why they are no longer conclusive
Visual inspection was the original AI photo check, and the classic artifacts are still worth knowing:
- Hands and fingers: extra, missing or fused fingers, impossible joints
- Text and signage: garbled letters, invented alphabets, inconsistent fonts
- Textures: waxy skin, hair strands that merge or dissolve, repeating patterns
- Light and shadow: shadows pointing different directions, reflections that don't match the scene
- Backgrounds: warped geometry, melted objects, crowds of distorted faces
Each new generator release removes some of these flaws, and current photorealistic models often pass casual inspection. Visual signs can justify a closer look, but they cannot settle the question on their own. A provenance record can answer it reliably.
The full guide: how to tell if a photo is AI-generatedAI detector vs. provenance check
| Pixel-based AI detector | Provenance check (this tool) | |
|---|---|---|
| What it examines | Statistical patterns in the pixels | The cryptographically signed record attached at creation |
| Output | A probability score ("87% likely AI") | Facts: who signed, with what tool, whether AI generation was recorded |
| False positives | Common. Edited, compressed or scanned real photos get flagged | Does not apply. It reports the record or its absence and does not guess |
| Ages over time | Degrades with every new generator release | Stays verifiable as long as the signature does |
| Limit | Can be wrong while reporting high confidence | Most images have no record; absence proves nothing either way |
Why this checker does not guess
Most AI image detectors run a classifier over the pixels and output a confidence score. Independent tests show that these classifiers err in both directions: heavily edited or scanned real photos get flagged as AI, while images from current generators often pass. A wrong answer with a confident percentage attached is worse than no answer.
The C2PA standard works the other way around. It records provenance when the image is created and protects the record cryptographically. The large AI generators now attach Content Credentials to their output, and several camera makers sign images in hardware. Reading that record yields facts rather than estimates. See which cameras support C2PA Content Credentials
Provenance instead of detection
Detection tries to judge from the pixels whether an image looks generated, and that judgement gets harder with every model generation. Provenance asks whether there is a verifiable record of where the image came from, which can be answered definitively. The transparency rules of the EU AI Act and the policies of the large photo contests rely on provenance for the same reason.
Provenance vs. AI detection, explained in depthFrequently asked questions
This checker reads C2PA Content Credentials. The absence of credentials does not mean an image is AI-generated, and their presence reflects what the signing tool recorded. The analysis runs entirely in your browser.